One economist, however, says that we are approaching the situation
from a completely miscalculated angle. James J. Heckman, Nobel Laureate and
professor of economics at the University of Chicago, thinks that instead of
approaching the economic issues with medicine to cover up the symptoms, we
should consider the root of the problem. In his keynote address for the Collaboration
for Early Childhood Education entitled, “Building a Productive Workforce and
Strengthening the Economy from Birth,” he said that politicians have looked at
social problems one at a time instead of attempting to look at the bigger
picture.
“Fragmented solutions don’t work, and the problems need to
be addressed at the core level,” he said.
Considering studies on economic status, education level, and
parental roles, Heckman maintained that the gap in social, intellectual, and
emotional preparedness between “privileged” and “underprivileged” children presents
itself very early in children. Attempts to close these gaps have been either
ineffective, and in some cases, have had adverse effects, such as lower high
school graduation rates.
The necessary skills that need development are perseverance,
attention, motivation, self-confidence, and self-discipline. By investing in
programs that foster these attributes in children, we would be promoting equal
opportunity and social fairness.
It is possible that if more funds were put into early
education, fewer funds would be needed for juvenile correction, prison,
training programs, and other initiatives that assist people in getting
themselves out of trouble or economic hardship.
It is clear that early childhood education is essential for
children to become productive members of society. But could investing in early
learning over time change some of this nation’s social and economic problems?
No comments:
Post a Comment